Comparison

From HTC-as-a-Service, KISTI
Revision as of 01:14, 21 May 2020 by Admin (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

This page shows a table contrasting the features of the similar projects with HTCaaS.


Table of Comparison

Development Period Auth Method Underlying Infra Target Application Supporting multi- application Job Description Language Parameter Sweep Agent-based Monitoring Tool Interface Type API Supports Web Service (API) GUI Resource Matchmaking Scheduling Policy Supported OS Others
HTCaaS 2010~ TBD Supercomputer, Cluster(PBS), Grid(EGEE Grid), Cloud(EC2) HTC / MTC YES JSDL YES YES (pilot) YES (as Web service API) RCP(GUI), CLI, API YES YES YES NO Dynamic- fairness Server: linux, Client: linux,window TBD HTCaaS
[Condor] 1985 ~ TBD Supercomputer(LSF), Cluster(PBS), Grid, Cloud(EC2), others HTC YES JDL TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD [Condor]
[DIRAC] TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD [DIRAC]